1H/1T′ phase transition in CVD-grown monolayer MoTe2 observed by TEM

March 21, 2025 – A team from the Center for Nanotechnology Innovation @NEST (Italy), Ulm University (Germany), the MAX IV Laboratory (Sweden), the University of Trento (Italy), and Sorbonne Université (France) is using graphene encapsulation and controlled thermal annealing in ultra-high vacuum to achieve a switch between the semiconducting 1H phase and the semimetallic 1T′ phase in MoTe2. The research opens new pathways for phase-change electronics and quantum devices based on 2D materials.

Molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe2) has attracted considerable attention among transition metal dichalcogenides due to its ability to exist in two stable configurations with only a small energy difference between the semiconducting 1H and the semimetallic 1T′ phases1. The 1H phase is known for its 1.1 eV band gap2 and strong spin–orbit coupling, while the monoclinic 1T′ phase exhibits superconductivity in the monolayer limit3 and has been predicted to be a quantum spin Hall insulator4. However, controlling the transition between these phases has proven challenging due to the low stability of monolayer MoTe25. Decomposition products, including Te-rich or Mo-rich phases, can further hinder phase transitions5,8. Researchers have reported heterophase junctions and mixed 2H/1T′ phases, achieved by tuning chemical vapor deposition (CVD) growth conditions68 as well as by employing molecular beam epitaxy9. Previous studies10 showed that hetero-contacts formed during CVD can trigger a 1H→1T′ phase transition in monolayer MoTe2, while local 1T′→1H conversion can be induced by electron beam irradiation under particular conditions11,12. Beam-induced tellurium vacancy lines, which generate 1H–1T′ interfaces, have also been found to stabilize the 1T′ phase and restrict reversion to the 1H configuration12. As a result, scientists emphasize that preventing defect formation—such as through encapsulation—is crucial for achieving a reversible 1H/1T′ phase transition.

A major breakthrough in reversible 2H↔1T′ polymorphism in few-layer MoTe2 was recently achieved by combining laser irradiation and ultra-high vacuum (UHV) annealing under protective encapsulation13. Building on this, the authors demonstrated that monolayer MoTe2 can be encapsulated with CVD-grown graphene and then subjected to thermal annealing in UHV to induce controlled phase transitions while avoiding oxidation. The findings reveal that heating the material to approximately 1090 °C results in a transformation from the 1H to the 1T′ phase, while subsequent annealing at about 900 °C triggers the reverse 1T′→1H transition, resulting in a reversible phase change. The extreme phase transition temperatures observed here—which are significantly higher than those previously reported for few-layer MoTe213,14—highlight the stabilizing effect of graphene encapsulation. To provide further insight into the critical temperatures and phase stability, the researchers also conducted density functional theory simulations.

Through a combination of Raman spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the research team uncovered detailed structural and chemical changes in MoTe2 during annealing. After synthesis and encapsulation, the material initially displayed the characteristic Raman modes of the 1H phase (E2g at 235 cm−1, A1g at 170 cm−1)15. As temperature increased, the 1T′ phase began to form at the edges of the flake, but only became fully stabilized above a critical threshold (Tc2) near 1075–1090 °C, marked by the disappearance of the 1H Raman signature14. Lowering the temperature (to Tc1 ≈ 880–900 °C) led to a reversion from 1T′ back to 1H, enabling a clear, two-way phase transition cycle. High-resolution TEM images revealed that the 1T′ phase can be obtained without introducing significant defects, while the reverted 1H regions contain line defects, such as mirror twin boundaries12,18. The graphene encapsulation appeared to suppress the formation of tellurium vacancy line defects that otherwise would trap the material in the 1T′ state. (Figure 1)

To further validate phase purity and domain structure, the authors performed µLEEM/LEED and μXPS analysis. The resulting diffraction patterns and XPS spectra highlight the polycrystalline nature of the 1T′ phase and corresponding chemical changes (Figure 2).

By analyzing spatially resolved Raman maps, the scientists quantified the kinetics of the 1T′→1H transformation, observing that the process is remarkably slow at the elevated temperatures required. The measured conversion rate is on the order of 10−4 s per unit cell (at ~800 °C), corresponding to phase boundary motion of only a few micrometers over 15 minutes. Arrhenius analysis of the temperature-dependent transformation rates revealed an activation energy of approximately 2.0 eV for the 1T′→1H transition. This value exceeds several theoretical predictions (~1.66 eV)16,21 but aligns with those reported for transitions in bulk-layer materials8. The high activation barrier helps explain why such high temperatures are necessary to achieve reversion in these experiments (Figure 3).

The research team also optimized phase quality by adjusting graphene encapsulation and annealing protocols. Optical imaging and spatially resolved Raman mapping demonstrated how the type and thickness of graphene encapsulation influence phase distribution, purity, and defect density within the MoTe2 layer (Figure 4).

Theoretical modeling played a crucial role in reconciling these experimental observations. Calculations using a fixed-lattice (constant cell) model explained the unusually high 1H→1T′ transition temperatures observed (~1300–1350 K) by incorporating the effects of thermal expansion, leading to approximately 1.1% biaxial strain at 1363 K24. Within this scenario, the 1T′ phase becomes thermodynamically favorable at high temperature, consistent with experimental results. A simple fixed-cell model, however, also predicts that the 1T′ phase remains stable during cooling, contradicting the observed reversion. In contrast, variable-cell (fully relaxed) models underestimate the transition temperature17 and cannot alone account for the reversibility. The scientists propose a hybrid mechanism: strong interaction between 1H-MoTe2 and the graphene substrate enforces a fixed lattice during heating, raising the 1H→1T′ transition temperature, while a weaker interaction for 1T′-MoTe2 permits lattice relaxation and enables the reversion. This view is supported by the rare observation of intact 1T′ domains after sample transfer to TEM grids, suggesting that the 1T′ phase is only metastable when not clamped by the substrate10,25. Calculated phase diagrams and theoretical results are provided in (Figure 5).

The study demonstrates a reversible semimetal–semiconductor phase transition in single-layer MoTe2 enabled by thermal cycling under graphene encapsulation. By leveraging CVD-grown MoTe2 and graphene, the approach ensures large-area uniformity and scalability—traits essential for future device applications11. The graphene/MoTe2 heterostructure offers a robust platform for exploring phase-change physics and may open new avenues for electronics, spintronics, and quantum devices2628. While theoretical work has long predicted promising applications for such phase-engineered two-dimensional systems, experimental efforts are now focused on fabricating devices that can harness the reversible 1H/1T′ transition and evaluating their performance and stability under real-world operating conditions. Prior studies have already shown that few-layer MoTe2 holds promise in near-infrared photodetectors and spintronic applications29,30. These latest findings extend such prospects to the monolayer regime and highlight the power of encapsulation and precise annealing to reversibly tailor material properties at the atomic scale.

Resource: Khaustov, V. O. et al. (2025). Reversible semimetal–semiconductor phase transition in CVD-grown monolayer MoTe2. 2D Materials, 12(2), 025025.

References
  1. Rehn, D. A., Li, Y., Pop, E., & Reed, E. J. (2018). Theoretical potential for low energy consumption phase change memory utilizing electrostatically-induced structural phase transitions in 2D materials. npj Computational Materials, 4(1), 2.

  2. Ruppert, C., Aslan, B., & Heinz, T. F. (2014). Optical properties and band gap of single-and few-layer MoTe2 crystals. Nano Letters, 14(11), 6231-6236.

  3. Rhodes, D. A., et al. (2021). Enhanced superconductivity in monolayer 1T′–MoTe2. Nano Letters, 21(6), 2505-2511.

  4. Qian, X., Liu, J., Fu, L., & Li, J. (2014). Quantum-spin Hall effect in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Science, 346(6215), 1344-1347.

  5. Chen, S. Y., Naylor, C. H., Goldstein, T., Johnson, A. C., & Yan, J. (2017). Intrinsic phonon bands in high-quality monolayer 1T′ molybdenum ditelluride. ACS Nano, 11(1), 814-820.

  6. Sánchez-Montejo, et al. (2017). Phase stability in MoTe2 prepared by low temperature Mo tellurization using close space isothermal Te annealing. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 198, 317-323.

  7. Yang, L., Zhang, W., Li, J., Cheng, S., Xie, Z., & Chang, H. (2017). Tellurization velocity-dependent metallic–semiconducting–metallic phase evolution in chemical vapor deposition growth of large-area, few-layer MoTe2. ACS Nano, 11(2), 1964-1972.

  8. Xu, X., et al. (2021). Seeded 2D epitaxy of large-area single-crystal films of the van der Waals semiconductor 2H MoTe2. Science, 372(6538), 195-200.

  9. Bhatt, K., Kandar, S., Kumar, N., Kapoor, A., & Singh, R. (2024). Investigating the impact of growth temperature on the direct integration of pure phase 2H-MoTe2 with Si (111) using molecular beam epitaxy. Applied Surface Science, 659, 159832.

  10. Khaustov, V. O., et al. (2023). Heterocontact-triggered 1H to 1T′ phase transition in CVD-grown monolayer MoTe2: Implications for low contact resistance electronic devices. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 7(16), 18094-18105.

  11. Han, G. H., et al. (2016). Absorption dichroism of monolayer 1T′-MoTe2 in visible range. 2D Materials, 3(3), 031010.

  12. Köster, J., Ghorbani-Asl, M., Komsa, H. P., Lehnert, T., Kretschmer, S., Krasheninnikov, A. V., & Kaiser, U. (2021). Defect agglomeration and electron-beam-induced local-phase transformations in single-layer MoTe2. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 125(24), 13601-13609.

  13. Lee, C. H., et al. (2023). In situ imaging of an anisotropic layer-by-layer phase transition in few-layer MoTe2. Nano Letters, 23(2), 677-684.

  14. Ryu, H., et al. (2021). Anomalous dimensionality-driven phase transition of MoTe2 in van der Waals heterostructure. Advanced Functional Materials, 31(51), 2107376.

  15. Kan, M., Nam, H. G., Lee, Y. H., & Sun, Q. (2015). Phase stability and Raman vibration of the molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe2) monolayer. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 17(22), 14866-14871.

  16. Ghasemi, A., & Gao, W. (2020). Atomistic mechanism of stress modulated phase transition in monolayer MoTe2. Extreme Mechanics Letters, 40, 100946.

  17. Hänggi, P., Talkner, P., & Borkovec, M. (1990). Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers. Reviews of Modern Physics, 62(2), 251.

  18. Zhu, H., Wang, Q., Cheng, L., Addou, R., Kim, J., Kim, M. J., & Wallace, R. M. (2017). Defects and surface structural stability of MoTe2 under vacuum annealing. ACS Nano, 11(11), 11005-11014.

  19. Ryu, H., et al. (2023). Laser-Induced Phase Transition and Patterning of hBN-Encapsulated MoTe2. Small, 19(17), 2205224.

  20. Zhang, C., et al. (2016). Charge mediated reversible metal–insulator transition in monolayer MoTe2 and WxMo1–xTe2 alloy. ACS Nano, 10(8), 7370-7375.

  21. Huang, H. H., Fan, X., Singh, D. J., Chen, H., Jiang, Q., & Zheng, W. T. (2016). Controlling phase transition for single-layer MTe2 (M = Mo and W): modulation of the potential barrier under strain. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 18(5), 4086-4094.

  22. Bouhafs, C., et al. (2021). Synthesis of large-area rhombohedral few-layer graphene by chemical vapor deposition on copper. Carbon, 177, 282-290.

  23. Pezzini, S., et al. (2020). 30°-twisted bilayer graphene quasicrystals from chemical vapor deposition. Nano Letters, 20(5), 3313-3319.

  24. Wang, Z. Y., Zhou, Y. L., Wang, X. Q., Wang, F., Sun, Q., Guo, Z. X., & Jia, Y. (2015). Effects of in-plane stiffness and charge transfer on thermal expansion of monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide. Chinese Physics B, 24(2), 026501.

  25. Ripoll-Sau, J., Calleja, F., Aguilar, P. C., Ibarburu, I. M., de Parga, A. L. V., Miranda, R., & Garnica, M. (2022). Phase control and lateral heterostructures of MoTe2 epitaxially grown on graphene/Ir (111). Nanoscale, 14(30), 10880-10888.

  26. Kou, L., Hu, F., Yan, B., Wehling, T., Felser, C., Frauenheim, T., & Chen, C. (2015). Proximity enhanced quantum spin Hall state in graphene. Carbon, 87, 418-423.

  27. Fumega, A. O., & Lado, J. L. (2023). Ferroelectric valley valves with graphene/MoTe2 van der Waals heterostructures. Nanoscale, 15(5), 2181-2187.

  28. Vila, M., et al. (2021). Low-symmetry topological materials for large charge-to-spin interconversion: The case of transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Physical Review Research, 3(4), 043230.

  29. Wu, D., et al. (2023). Phase-controlled van der Waals growth of wafer-scale 2D MoTe2 layers for integrated high-sensitivity broadband infrared photodetection. Light: Science & Applications, 12(1), 5.

  30. Shinde, P. V., Hussain, M., Moretti, E., & Vomiero, A. (2024). Advances in two-dimensional molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe2): A comprehensive review of properties, preparation methods, and applications. SusMat, 4(5), e236.